|
|
CSUH EDU-6701Online Teaching & Learning Mini-Project #1 by the “e-Team” Marilyn Kerr, Joe Novosel, Mark Eades
Summary of Common Issues Within Our TeamOur common issues were surrounding initial implementations of online learning options within a corporation or institution. Some of the initial considerations are listed below.
See the section titled “Exploring the Common Issues Within Our Team” for the questions they raise and our research around them. Selected Issue: Initial Strategies for Implementing Online LearningWe decided that the issues we had researched and discussed were surrounding the initial implementation of an online learning system so we decided to focus on researching methodologies for strategizing a successful implementation. Our Most Helpful Publicationsbrandon-hall.com, “Six Steps to Implementing E-Learning”, 2001. http://www.brandonhall.com/public/forms/sixstepdb/
ASTD Roadmap for
E-learning
Anderson, Terry. “Is
E-learning Right for Your Organization?” , American Society for Training and
Development, 2002. King, James W.; Nugent, Gwen C; Russell, Earl B.; Eich, Jenni; and Lacy, Dara D. “Policy Frameworks for Distance Education.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Summer 2000) http://www.westga.edu/~distance/king32.html McAlister M. Khris; Rivera, Julio C.; and Hallam Stephen F. “Twelve Important Questions to Answer Before You Offer a Web Based Curriculum.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Summer 2001) http://www.westga.edu/~distance/odjla/summer42/mcalister42.html Pope, Scott. “Form a Successful Strategy”, e-learning magazine, February 1, 2002 http://www.elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=9538 SummaryCorporate Strategy ModelsThe most useful resources for corporate implementation take a business-like approach, and are usually set up as step-by-step models, often within a project management framework. All successful models offer guidance in dealing with these critical elements:
These guidelines are very helpful to the would-be e-learning practitioner in the corporate world because the costs and benefits of online learning are very different from traditional classroom training as practiced in a corporation. Most corporations that offer training are not in the business of training - training is simply a necessary support function (much like accounting, marketing or administration staff). There are often training-related costs such as travel, class fees or instructors on staff, but these costs are usually compartmentalized within various departments. When a corporation decides to take on e-learning of any scale, it needs to become a corporate-wide strategy, because now issues of connectivity, technology implementation, staffing and product costs become centralized issues (due to the significant initial costs and widespread corporate impact). Because the e-learning effort gains tremendous visibility, the steps to gaining buy-in along the way are critical for the success of the project. Often the person "leading the charge" is not highly skilled in gaining corporate buy-in from all of the stakeholders involved in creating an e-learning environment. Even when the leadership is coming from the top down, such as a visionary executive like John Chambers, CEO of Cisco, the organizational impacts are so widespread that everyone needs to "be on the same page" for the initiative to be a success. Fortunately, there are several good studies that offer a practical approach to implementing corporate e-learning strategies. Four of the best are listed in our “Most Helpful Publications” section. Finding Practical Models for the Corporate WorldWhen researching case studies of actual implementation successes, failures and regrets, one finds resources centered on learning institutions or vendor-published corporate examples whose solution inevitably is to work with the vendor. Some vendors highlight the specific steps they take for implementing a solution; some vendors do not. Another online resource is Brandon-Hall. While they sell most of their reports for a fee; they are objective, authoritative and worth the price. Networking offline is an excellent additional way to learn from others. Attending e-learning conferences and symposiums offers a tremendous opportunity to network with colleagues at various stages of an implementation and to learn from their experiences. Classroom sessions are usually offered on a range of relevant topics and there is usually a bizarre of vendors to meet with and learn from in a concentrated, less formal fashion. In addition to sales representatives, you can talk to their software developers, implementation consultants, instructional designers and a range of support staff that offer a diversity of perspective. Another offline resource is your professional affiliation group/s, such as the local chapter of ASTD (American Society of Training Development). There, you can probably find local colleagues that can contribute insights from experience. Academic ModelsIn “Twelve Important Questions to Answer Before You Offer a Web Based Curriculum,” McAlister et al identify a series of questions to ask that form a process of implementation of web-based curriculum. These include:
In “Policy Frameworks for Distance Education,” King et al advocate an organizational strategy referred to as the “policy analysis framework” (PAF). According to these authors, the seven elements for attention in the PAF were: 1. Academic 2. Governance/administration/fiscal 3. Faculty 4. Legal 5. Student support services 6. Technical 7. Cultural These seven elements, according to the authors, are fundamental to developing and managing a distance education program; and are consistent across the spectrum of public and private educational or training programs. A more simplified version of the PAF offered by these authors is the “three tiered PAF,” the elements of which are: 1. Faculty 2. Students/participants 3. Management and organization In either form, according to these authors, the PAF is a conceptual framework that takes into account all stakeholders in a proposed or existing distance education program; and which “offers the decision maker an expeditious way to think about the major issues of faculty, student support, management of the educational process and the wide array of technological issues.” Exploring the Common Issues Within Our TeamOur common issues were surrounding initial implementations of online learning options within a corporation or institution. Some of the initial considerations are listed below. Common Issue #1: Selling the idea of online learning
Resources: Pope, Scott. “Form a Successful Strategy”, e-learning magazine, February 1, 2002. http://www.elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=9538 Common Issue #2: Selecting the right vendor solution for your organization
Resources: Buyer’s Guide, e-learning products, e-learning magazine http://www.mediabrains.com/client/ELearning/BG1/subcategory.asp?SessionID={33F25960-D23E-4CE6-B24C-CC2922B2E76C}&ct_categoryID={BD1F9AB5-6304-4EDD-9119-AFE87F0F6267}&ct_categoryname=e%2Dlearning+Products Common Issue #3: Gaining "C-level" support (CEO, CIO, COO, etc.)
Resources:
Common Issue #4: IT Challenges (Bandwidth, server-based or hosted solution)
Common Issue #5: Making a Case for Return on Investment
Resources: Kirkpatrick, Don. “Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels”, University of Wisconsin, March 5, 2001. https://secure.presenter.com/p2/pls/detail-client.asp?iconnectid=CEF6C97R&id=sscrob000002&compid=ssc&uid=XX9E0P44DRT6BVDG Reddy, Arjun. “E-Learning ROI Calculations”, e-learning magazine, January, 2001. http://www.elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=6711 Aldrich, Clark. “Measuring Success”, Online Learning Magazine, February 01, 2002 http://www.onlinelearningmag.com/onlinelearning/search/search_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1278801 Common Issue #6: Instructional Strategies
Resources: Care, W. Dean and Scanlan. “Planning and Managing the Development of Courses for Distance Delivery: Results From a Qualitative Study.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol 4, No. 3 (Summer 2001) http://www.westga.edu/~distance/odjla/summer42/care42.html MnPFT Update (Minnesota Partnerships for Training), Vol 2, No. 2 (July 1998) http://www.d.umn.edu/~mnpft/what/071998.html Stout, Connie. “Meeting the Changing Needs of Students.” Apple Imagine: Point of View. http://www.apple.com/education/k12/imagine/0102/pov |
|
Send mail to
joeracer@earthlink.net with
questions or comments about this web site.
|